TECHNICAL SESSION · LIVE · 60 MIN · HANDS ON
Create the project, load the budget, and enter the projection that makes every later number readable.
Session Home › Session Overview
On the Oakhaven Public Safety Campus the agreement is signed and the fee is locked at $2.8M. The project number exists. The team is assigned and the first hours are already going in. A project manager opens the scorecard to check the budget position and finds Budget Effort reading zero.
Nothing is wrong with the fee. Nothing has been entered.
This session covers the setup work that every later number depends on. A project created from the wrong template, a budget loaded without phasing, or an hourly project with no Effort Projection all produce the same result: a scorecard that reports figures no one can act on. The work takes one hour and it happens once.
THE HANDOFF
Module 4 ends with an executed agreement, a fee built from the Project Budgeting Spreadsheet, and a project opened in the firm’s systems. Module 5 begins with a work plan built from that fee. Between the two sits a step the course has named in five places and taught in none, the step where the project becomes a record in BST.
The record matters because every number the program teaches afterward is read off it. Module 2 reads Revenue beside Effort and finds the Variance between them. Module 3 reads Unbilled Days and Receivable Days. Module 9 reads schedule and cost variance each accounting cycle. All three assume a project that was set up correctly, and none of them says how.
The single most requested topic in the growth survey named this directly: “New Grace procedures for starting a project within our new systems, mainly BST.” In the responsibility matrix, creating the project in BST11 ranks 21 of 44 at a priority of 23.2.
THE RECORD
A project is not created from a blank form. It is copied from a template that carries the phase structure, the task codes, and the billing setup already standard for that kind of work, and it is then submitted for review before it goes live.
The course states the mechanism in a single clause, drawn from the responsibility matrix: create the project in BST11 using Copy Project from the market-segment template, then submit it for Project Accountant review. The session works that clause into a procedure a project manager can repeat.
Two decisions sit inside it. The first is which market-segment template the project belongs to, because the template sets the phase structure the fee will be loaded against. The second is when to submit for review, because hours charged before the record is approved land somewhere, and moving them later is accounting work rather than project work.
THE STRUCTURE
Loading a budget means distributing the net fee across the phases the project will actually run, in the proportions the work will actually consume, and staffing each phase at the rates the fee supports.
Consider the Oakhaven fee. The total design fee is $2.8M, of which $1.4M is consultant work and $1,400,000 is what Grace earns with its own people. That net figure is what loads against phases. Loading the gross fee produces a project that appears to have twice the money it has.
The phase split follows the shape of the work rather than an even division. Construction Documents carries the largest share because it carries the most hours.
| Phase | Share of net fee | Value | What the phase is for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schematic Design | 20% | $280,000 | Options framed and a direction chosen |
| Design Development | 20% | $280,000 | The chosen direction resolved |
| Construction Documents | 35% | $490,000 | The set built and coordinated |
| Bidding and Negotiation | 5% | $70,000 | The set priced and a contractor recommended |
| Construction Administration | 20% | $280,000 | The work observed and administered |
Staffing follows the same logic. The Planning Studio in Module 5 makes the point in cost terms: 120 Principal hours at $310 per hour is $37,200, close to 17 percent of an entire phase cost budget. A phase staffed above the rate the fee supports reads healthy on hours and unhealthy on margin.
The course states the setup as budget, phasing, and staffing together. A budget loaded without phasing gives one number for the whole project and hides the phase that is losing money. Construction Documents can read minus $163,333.33 while the project total still reads plus $18,666.67.
THE MISSING INPUT
Hourly and time and materials work runs on the identical scorecard as fixed fee work, with one difference that changes everything the scorecard reports. Fixed fee work carries a budget by definition. Hourly work does not, and nothing supplies one automatically.
The planned value of hourly work is entered as an Effort Projection, and it is entered before the work starts. Without it, Budget Effort reads zero, and a Variance measured against zero carries no meaning. The course is explicit that this is a missing input rather than a limit of the tool. No one enters it unless a project manager builds it.
The consequence compounds quietly. A project manager running hourly work opens the scorecard every month, reads a Variance column that has never been able to say anything, and concludes the project is fine. The Competent Coordinator checks the budget, confirms the schedule is on track, and moves on.
?Reflect
Think of an hourly or time and materials project running now. Open its scorecard and read the Budget Effort column. Does it carry a number, or does it read zero? Now consider what the Variance column on that project has been telling anyone who looked at it for the last three months.
THE SCREENS
BST presents a project through more than one view, and the views answer different questions. Reaching for the wrong one is the most common reason a project manager reports that the system does not show what they need.
The Project and Resource Management dashboard carries three tabs. My Projects Review and My Projects Trends and Status are the project view, the place a project manager reads one project in detail. My Portfolio Alerts is the firm view, every Grace project ranked by risk, and it is the tab a principal opens first.
Above those tabs sits the Restrictions bar, which decides what the screen is even looking at. It filters on Project Status, Project Manager, Currency Type, and Project. A dashboard that appears empty is more often a dashboard filtered to the wrong manager than a dashboard with no data.
| The question | Where it is answered | What to read |
|---|---|---|
| Is this project earning what it is spending? | My Projects Review | Revenue beside Effort, then Variance |
| Is the trend improving or decaying? | My Projects Trends and Status | Variance across consecutive periods |
| Which project in the firm needs attention first? | My Portfolio Alerts | Variance At Completion and schedule slip |
| Which invoices are aging? | Aged Unbilled and Receivables Aging | The 31 to 60, 61 to 90, 91 to 120, and over 121 bands |
| What document sits behind this number? | The right-click Related Items menu | Open the bill from the figure |
The right-click menu offers View Prebills in Draft, and the course notes it is better to use the Bills inquiry instead. The Bills inquiry is never shown anywhere in the program. This session demonstrates it live.
THE CHECK
A project manager can confirm a setup in under two minutes by reading five columns. The check runs once at setup and again the first time real hours land, because the second reading is the one that catches a structure that looked right and was not.
SUMMARY
The setup work is small and it is decisive. Copy the project from the market-segment template that matches the work, load the net fee across real phases, staff each phase to the rate that phase supports, and on hourly work enter the Effort Projection before the first hour is charged. Then submit for Project Accountant review and confirm the record afterward.
Module 5 opens next and builds the work plan against the structure this session created. A work plan built on a project that was never phased produces a schedule no one can measure.
Before the session
This session teaches what the course already establishes. The items below are named across the program and documented nowhere, so they are listed rather than invented. Each one is a short answer from Grace that turns a gap into content.
| Open item | What is needed |
|---|---|
| The market-segment template list | The course names Copy Project from the market-segment template and never lists the templates. Grace supplies the list and the rule for choosing between them. |
| Where the Effort Projection is entered | The course explains the projection in depth and never says where in BST it lives. This is the single largest gap in the session. |
| The Project Accountant review turnaround | How long review takes, and what a project manager may and may not do while the record is pending. |
| Which dashboard version is current | The course carries two different BST screen designs under two different names. Grace confirms which one the cohort will see. |
| The BST11 field reference | Cited as the source of the column definitions and never provided. Attaching it to this session would close a documented gap. |
The Quick Reference carries the procedure and the dates in one page. The Additional References page lists what exists today and what is still being built.